Last week’s hearing: Oversight Hearing on “Funding Priorities for and the United States’ Responsibilities concerning Indians, Alaska Natives, and Insular Areas in the President’s FY 2016 Budget Request for the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Indian Health Service, Office of Insular Affairs, and Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians.” See discussion beginning around 16:40. Rep. Doug LaMalfa questions the Assistant Secretary about the revised regs. ASIA states that there can’t be large gaps in time (i.e. 20 years), to ensure that gaps don’t interfere with the confidence of the process.
BIA expected to finalize changes to federal recognition process
Tuesday, March 24, 2015
Filed Under: National | Recognition
More on: 114th, bia, connecticut, hnrc, house, kevin washburn, ncai, richard blumenthal
Assistant Secretary Kevin Washburn, the head of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Photo from Bureau of Indian Affairs / Twitter
The Bureau of Indian Affairs is expected to finalize Part 83 reforms to the federal recognition process in the next couple of months.
|The rules have been in development for nearly two years. The comment period closed at the end of September 2014 and more than 350 responses and about 2,000 form letters were received, The Connecticut Mirror reported. The reforms make two significant changes to the existing process. Petitioning groups only have to provide documents dating back to 1934 — as opposed to time of first contact — if the changes are adopted.
The proposal also allows groups that already went through the process to re-apply. But a controversial provision allows interested parties to object, which might make it impossible for state-recognized Connecticut tribes to gain recognition.
Tribes in the state, along with the National Congress of American Indians, have asked the BIA to drop the provision. Even Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut), who has been a critic of the existing process, believes it’s unconstitutional.
Indianz.Com SoundCloud: Assistant Secretary Washburn addresses federal recognition reforms at about 20 minutes into the question and answer
Washburn hasn’t said whether the provision, along with other controversial changes, will be included in the final rule. He was asked about the reforms at a House Subcommittee Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs hearing last week.
“We want it to be a rigorous review and that is not something that’s negotiable,” Washburn told lawmakers. “We aren’t going to make it less rigorous.
Get the Story:
Blumenthal: Effort to block recognition of CT tribes faces challenges (The Connecticut Mirror 3/23)
Federal Register Notices:
Federal Acknowledgment of American Indian Tribes (July 30, 2014)
Federal Acknowledgment of American Indian Tribes (May 29, 2014)
Proposed Rule | Press Release | Comparison Chart (comparing current rule to proposed rule) | Response to Comments on June 2013 Discussion Draft | Frequently Asked Questions
Faculty Director, Indian Legal Program
Director, Indian Legal Clinic
Clinical Professor of Law
Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law
Tempe, AZ 85287
The attached information is regarding Indian Child Welfare Act. The state and unrecognized children are not mentioned. We need to push for our children to be protected..
This is open for comments.
Nancy Carnley, Vice Chief
Ma-Chis Lower Creek Indian Tribe of Alabama-
64 Private Road 1312
Elba Al. 36323
FYI …Please share with others. The state tribes and non federal recognized tribes need to really look at this. The I does not refer to me it refers to Christina Snider.
From: “Christina Snider” <csnider@NCAI.org>
To: “John Dossett” <John_Dossett@NCAI.org>, “Jacqueline Pata” <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Attached is a revised version of NCAI’s comments on the Treasury Interim Consultation Policy. Please send any additional comments or questions to Christina Snider or John Dossett by COB Tuesday, March 31.
I have also attached a more general template for Tribal/Organizational comments. Remember that all comments must be received by Treasury no later than Thursday, April 2, and can be sent to email@example.com.
Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians
National Congress of American Indians
1516 P Street Northwest
Washington DC 20005(202) 466-7767 x 201 firstname.lastname@example.org
Click here: http://www.indianz.com/News/2015/016816.asp
The Little Shell Tribe is indeed following the administrative process at the Bureau of Indian Affairs. But it’s dragged out for more than a decade with conflicting rulings from the agency that have yet to be resolved.
Thanks to Patricia Ferguson & Indianz News.